Thursday, June 11, 2015

6 Things You Can Do To Help Win Your Personal Injury Lawsuit - Part 2: Don't Wait to See A Doctor

     When you are involved in a personal injury claim or lawsuit, you will be judged by the "reasonable person" standard. This standard can be very hard to meet, because it is often subjective (based upon who is applying the standard to you) and because most people believe they always behave as reasonable people do. However, one of the easiest ways to "act like a reasonable person" when you are injured is to seek medical treatment and seek it without delay.





     Keep in mind that, while there are many many reasons to go to a doctor when you are hurt, this article will only discuss the legal perspectives on seeking medical treatment.

     Defense attorneys and insurance companies, two groups that you will very likely be fighting against while pursuing your personal injury claim, will examine your actions leading up to and after the incident for evidence of your injuries. They will be trying to find a way to either avoid paying out on your claim. A very common technique is to establish that you were not, in fact, injured (or at least not hurt as severely as you claim) because you did not seek medical attention or waited too long before you sought medical treatment.

     It is an argument that is made in almost every personal injury claim or lawsuit: "If (the injured person) was actually hurt, or was hurt as bad as he/she claims, why didn't he/she go to the doctor immediately?" or "why did he/she wait so long before following up with a doctor, or receiving further treatment?" Now there certainly may be many reasons why you didn't go to a doctor or hospital immediately: scheduling difficulties, financial concerns, not wanting to go to a doctor unless it is absolutely necessary. While these reasons may seem perfectly reasonable to you, they may not seem perfectly reasonable to a judge or jury.

     If you think you may have been injured due to the fault of another, and you are not sure if you should go to a physician, remember this: "when a reasonable person is injured, a reasonable person gets medical treatment as soon as possible, and continues to get treatment until they are healed." This is the standard you will be held to by the judge, the jury, the defense attorneys and the insurance companies, so remember it and make your life a little easier.



*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Thursday, May 28, 2015

6 Things You Can Do To Help Win Your Personal Injury Lawsuit - Part 1: Talk to Your Attorney

     Recently I was contacted by a client who asked if there was anything he could do, or anything he should do, to increase the odds of getting a favorable outcome from his personal injury lawsuit. That got me thinking about some common advice that we often give to our clients when contacted about personal injury claims. Besides the obvious (find a good attorney), there are 6 things you can do to help shorten the time it takes to resolve your case, increase the value of your case, and increase the odds of a favorable outcome. This post will focus on the first: Talk to your attorney.



     This may seem obvious, but the first piece of advice is to talk to your attorney. All too often clients hire an attorney and then wait for their attorney to contact them, forget to keep their attorney apprised of updates in their case, or are afraid to ask their attorney questions. This can cause a litany of problems with your case.

     Remember your attorney works for you. His/her job is to protect your rights and fight for you, and it is important to remember that your attorney is on your side. Your attorney has an extensive education, training and experience to draw from to give you advice on your case and answer your questions. This is an invaluable resource, and one that you are entitled to once you have hired an attorney. Ask as many questions as you can about your case, what you should and should not be doing and whether there are any issues with your case. Let your attorney know if there any changes or updates in your condition or any issues relating to your case; for example, if your medical condition changes, you visit a new doctor, you are discharged from medical care, etc. Remember your attorney only knows what you tell him or her; if you don't keep your attorney up to date, he/she can't give you the legal representation you deserve.

     Just as often there are attorneys who neglect to keep in touch with their clients after they are hired and fail to keep lines of communication open. It is recommended that clients make regular calls to your attorney, even if your attorney doesn't make regular calls to you. Again, your attorney works for you. Your lawyer might have dozens, or even hundreds of other cases besides yours, but your case is your only case, and it deserves to be treated as such.

   

If you have further questions or concerns about your case, or a potential case, please call a licensed attorney, or contact Eckert & Smestad, LLC: www.eckertsmestad.com.

*This is attorney advertising. No attorney-client agreement or related privileges are created without further written agreement by all parties. The above is meant only as general advice. Consult a licensed attorney for advice on your specific case.

Sunday, December 14, 2014

New Illinois Law May Make It Easier to Get Out of Jury Duty

     The Illinois Legislature has passed Bill 3075, which is waiting for Governor Quinn's signature before it comes into law. Many believe that this law is great news for Illinois citizens. Why? Because Bill 3075 will significantly reduce the likelihood that each citizen gets called in for jury duty.

     Jury duty, while a very important service required to maintain our legal system, has never been very popular. As almost anyone who has been called for jury duty will recount, it can be tedious and inconvenient, and on top of it, jurors aren't compensated very well for their time.

     Every Illinois citizen over the age of 18 can be selected at random for jury duty. Bill 3075 will cut the number of jurors at civil trials from 12 to 6. Less jurors at trial will reduce the size of jury pools, which will reduce the number of individuals selected for jury duty, which will reduce the odds that each individual citizen is called for jury duty.

                                                  



     This bill also raises the compensation levels for jurors to $25 for the first day and $50 for each additional day of service. This compared with current law which sets jury compensation by county population size; the highest current jury pay is in Cook County, which pays $17.20/day.

     Bill 3075 is supported by a large swath of the Illinois population, including several prominent legal interest groups, including the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association. It is also opposed by some other legal interest groups, typically those focused on civil defense. These defense groups argue that this bill favors plaintiffs, there aren't conclusive studies which support this assertion.

     The bill's supporters claim that it makes civil trials more efficient and is designed to benefit jurors. Supporters also argue that the bill will save state and county governments a significant amount of money, which considering the current state of Illinois budget problems, could offer a great deal of relief.  to Illinois. Supporters also cite the bill's increased jury compensation provision will make jurors happier, and result in more attentive and effective juries.

     For more information, see these articles: here and here.


*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Sunday, November 23, 2014

A Note to Renters and Landlords


     A few months into prime apartment renting season seems like a good time to review an Illinois statute relating to landlords and renters alike: the Security Deposit Return Act (765 ILCS 710/1). Security deposits were designed as a safety net for landlords to protect themselves in the event the renter causes damage to the apartment; however, security deposits can become a point of contention between renters and landlords. This Statute applies to landlords who have 5 or more rental units and collect security deposits from their renters.  It is a fairly straightforward statute governing how landlords are to treat security deposits after the termination of a lease.



     According to the Security Deposit Return Act, the landlord must return the security deposit to the renters within 30 days after the termination of the lease, assuming there is no damage which would result in deductions from the security deposit. In the event repairs need to be made, the landlord must, again within 30 days of the termination of the lease, either return the remaining amount of the security deposit to the renter along with copies of receipts for any repair work, or provide an estimate for work to be done to the renter and return the remainder of the deposit to the renter. In any event, the landlord is prohibited from keeping the security deposit for any longer than 45 days after the termination of the lease.

     If a landlord violates this Act (namely, fails to return the security deposit and receipts within the time frame discussed above), the renter may file suit against the landlord in order to have the security deposit returned. A landlord who is found to have violated this Act may also be required to pay the attorney's fees the renter incurred in pursuing his or her lawsuit. This can be very expensive for the landlord.

     The lesson to be learned from this Act is this: If you're a renter, know your rights. If you're a landlord, make sure you return that security deposit and receipts within 30 days.


*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

The Importance of Following Up with Your Doctor

     Here is a situation that occurs all too often: Someone gets hurt.  They go to the emergency room, or their primary care doctor.  When the physician asks them about what is wrong, they play tough and give a general answer, and don't share all of the symptoms they are having.  Or the doctor instructs them to return in a week, or two weeks, but several weeks, even months go by, before they make an appointment and come back to see the doctor, complaining that the pain is still there.  Sometimes the doctor will instruct them to get an MRI, an X-ray, get physical therapy, and they put it off and never actually follow the doctor's orders.  There are three common problems illustrated in this scenario: 1. Failing to fully disclose all symptoms to the treating physician; 2. Failing to make follow up appointments with their physician timely; and 3. Failing to follow their physician's instructions.

     As if it isn't obvious, it is extremely important to listen to, and be completely honest with, your physician or hospital staff once an injury has occurred.  For many this is obvious.  However, very often life can get in the way of timely following up with your physician.  Failing to follow your doctor's instructions, make follow up appointments, make all complaints known to your doctor, or return for additional treatment when symptoms persist can have dire consequences, both for your health and any potential claim you may have for personal injuries.

     The most important reason that you should be fully upfront with your physicians, and follow the doctor's instructions, is for your own health.  A doctor can't feel what is going on in your body.  He or she doesn't know if you're having neck pain, or shoulder pain, or leg pain, or numbness, or whatever the symptom unless you tell your doctor.  And if he or she doesn't know about the symptom, he or she cannot possibly provide an accurate diagnosis or treatment to make the pain go away.  The longer an injury, no matter how slight you think it is, goes undiagnosed, the more likely it is to become a serious or chronic condition, requiring more invasive and extensive medical treatment to heal.





     If your doctor instructs you to return in a few weeks, or instructs you to seek physical therapy, or radiological tests, it is because he or she believes that this is necessary for your injuries to heal properly. If you don't follow your doctor's instructions, it is extremely likely that your injuries will not heal properly, and again, they could easily become serious or chronic conditions.

     The second reason to be fully upfront with your physician, and follow their instructions, is to protect your rights.  If you are injured, and the injury gives rise to a claim, you have certain rights inherent in that claim.  The medical records your physician creates when you visit are the evidence of your injury and of the treatment the injury required.  It is not enough to simply say "I was injured, pay me."  If it was that easy everyone in the country would be broke, for constantly paying out on injury claims.  Injured parties have the burden to prove they were injured, to what extent they were injured, and that the medical treatment they received was reasonable for their injuries.

     When a claim is made, the insurance company investigating the claim will be looking for any reason they can find to either not pay or pay less than they should.  This is their business.  One of the most cited excuses given by insurance companies for denying claims, or refusing to pay the full value of a claim, is because of gaps in the medical treatment (meaning weeks going by without a follow up appointment), inconsistencies in the patient's complaints to their physicians, and failure to follow a physician's instructions.  Unfortunately, the reason this is effective is because juries generally don't look upon these things favorably.  To a jury when a reasonable person is injured (reasonable person being the legal standard applied by juries to most civil cases), he or she will be completely honest with their physician and report ALL of their symptoms.  To a jury a reasonable person will continue to make regular appointments with their doctors until their symptoms have completely healed.  To a jury a reasonable person will listen to their doctor and follow their doctor's instructions completely.  Whatever reason you may have for not being completely honest, or not following your doctor's instructions, or not making timely follow up appointments, a jury will likely not pay attention.  They have already heard what they need.

    When you are injured, your job is to heal.  Do your job and let your doctor help you.  When you are injured, the insurance companies job is to take diminish your claim.  Don't do their job for them.  As always, if you are injured and you believe it was due to the negligence of another party, make sure you speak with a licensed and competent attorney.


*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Staten Island Man Dies After Potential Police Brutality Incident

     There is no question that Police Officers, in general, are brave, respectable individuals who put their lives on the line to protect us all. Unfortunately, there are a small number of police officers who have abused the authority and power given to them and hurt, or even killed, the citizens they were sworn to protect. These incidents, however uncommon, can be so disturbing that the stories spread throughout the community and can result in severe distrust for members of the police force. Recently, an incident occurred in New York City which has brought the discussion of police brutality.





     On July 17, 2014 a 43-year old Staten Island man, Eric Garner, died after an encounter with New York City police officers. A number of NYPD officers approached Garner regarding an investigation into the illegal sale of cigarettes. Witnesses stated that an argument broke out between Garner and the officers, and at some point one of the officers placed the asthmatic Garner in a chokehold. Garner reportedly fell to the ground and passed out after telling the officer he could not breath. He was pronounced dead later that evening at Richmond University Medical Center, although the cause of death has yet to be determined. The incident was filmed by witnesses, a copy of the video (Warning: May be disturbing) can be found here.

     During a press conference with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio and New York City Police Commissioner William J. Bratton, Commissioner Bratton stated that it was against NYPD policy to use chokeholds, even when interacting with individuals who may be resisting arrest. This incident has prompted an investigation into the cause of Garner's death and the possible violation of Garner's civil rights by the officers. Some have accused these officers of using excessive force against Garner, and the incident has sparked anger in the community against the NYPD.

    Regardless of the result of the investigation into the Garner incident, there are certainly incidents in which police officers have abused their power and violated citizens' civil rights. If you, a friend or a loved one has been the victim of excessive force, false arrest, illegal search and seizures, or any other civil rights violation by a member of the police, it is recommended that they talk to a licensed and competent attorney.


*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.



   

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Continued Trouble for GM - Watch Out for More Recalls

     About 4 months ago, General Motors made national headlines when it began recalling 2.6 million vehicles due to problems with the vehicles' ignition switches. The ignition problems, which many have called negligent designing and manufacturing by GM, had caused an estimated 54 car crashes and 13 deaths. But GM's problems are not over, and neither are the worries of GM customers.





     On Monday, June 16, 2014 GM issued yet another recall due to problems with GM vehicles' ignition switches. For this recall, the 44th GM has issued this year, covers an additional 3.4 million vehicles. The latest GM recall covers the following models:

 - 2005-2009 Buick Lacrosse
 - 2006-2014 Chevrolet Impala
 - 2000-2005 Cadillac Deville
 - 2004-2011 Cadillac DTS
 - 2006-2011 Buick Lucerne
 - 2004-2005 Buick Regal LS & GS
 - 2006-2008 Chevrolet Monte Carlo

    The initial recall was due to problems with the ignition, which has been shown to switch from the "run" position without notice, causing an engine stall. This recall, however, is due to problems with the design of the car keys, which can cause the vehicle to switch out of the "run" position due to excess weight or a sudden bump or shake. This can cause the car to stall, power steering to shut off, and drivers to lose control. According to reports, the key problems have caused 8 crashes and 6 injuries.

    If you, or someone you know, owns or operates one of the GM vehicles covered by the recall, please make sure to check the General Motors website or a local GM dealer for recall information. And, as always, if you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident, related to these problems or otherwise, contact a licensed and competent attorney.

(Information obtained from NBC news.com)


*This is attorney advertising, and is not intended to be taken as legal advice, nor is it intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Any advice given in the preceding statement is given as general advice and is not intended to be relied upon as legal advice for any specific scenarios. For specific advice, or for answers to your questions, call Eckert & Smestad (312-789-4810) or call a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.